Do Something

Weigh in on legal weed

Reach out to your state representatives and let them know what you want to see from marijuana legislation. Tax revenue? Better medical research? Small business investment? Social justice?

Sen. Street’s website allows PA residents to show their support for adult-use  marijuana legislation by signing on as a “citizen co-sponsor.” You can also check out his podcast on Apple, Spotify, and Pandora.

Connect WITH OUR SOCIAL ACTION TEAM



Read More

Solutions for better citizenship

One of the founding tenets of The Philadelphia Citizen is to get people the resources they need to become better, more engaged citizens of their city.

We hope to do that in our Good Citizenship Toolkit, which includes a host of ways to get involved in Philadelphia — whether you want to contact your City Councilmember about the challenges facing your community, get those experiencing homelessness the goods they need, or simply go out to dinner somewhere where you know your money is going toward a greater good.

Find an issue that’s important to you in the list below, and get started on your journey of A-plus citizenship.

Vote and strengthen democracy

Stand up for marginalized communities

Create a cleaner, greener Philadelphia

Help our local youth and schools succeed

Support local businesses

Cheat Sheet

Legal cannabis and tax revenue

In 1983, then-State Senator Milton Street introduced a marijuana legalization/taxation measure designed to generate additional revenue for the state, lower tax burdens on his North Philly constituents, and recognize reality. Street said over a million PA residents consumed marijuana in 1983, irrespective of marijuana being illegal. PA state legislators refused to approve the measure.

Had it passed, in the last 40 years, the commonwealth would have seen twelve billion dollars in tax revenue from the legal marijuana industry we could have had.

Temple journalism professor Linn Washington Jr. writes that our state legislators need to overcome their aversion to legalization, end marijuana prohibition, and create a tax revenue benefit for Pennsylvania. 

Guest Commentary

Marijuana Madness Mugs PA Tax Revenue

The late Milton Street proposed legalizing recreational weed in 1983. A longtime local journalist wonders how we can still justify giving up millions of much-needed tax dollars

Guest Commentary

Marijuana Madness Mugs PA Tax Revenue

The late Milton Street proposed legalizing recreational weed in 1983. A longtime local journalist wonders how we can still justify giving up millions of much-needed tax dollars

Twelve billion dollars is an astounding amount of money.

This sum, if stacked up in one-dollar bills, reaches over 800 miles in height … a distance more than twice the east-west length of Pennsylvania.

Twelve billion dollars is an amount of money that never passed through PA state tax coffers because PA state legislators refused to approve a measure introduced in1983 by a State Senator from North Philadelphia to legalize and tax marijuana.

Then-State Senator Milton Street introduced that marijuana legalization/taxation measure to generate additional revenue for the state (then in a budget deficit crisis), to lower tax burdens on his North Philly constituents, and to recognize reality. Street said over a million PA residents consumed marijuana in 1983, irrespective of marijuana being illegal.

“We can either tax marijuana or raise other taxes. You can’t have it both ways. We don’t manufacture money in Pennsylvania,” Street told me during a March 1983 interview when I worked as a reporter for The Daily News.

The rejectionist mindset Street encountered 43 years ago remains active inside the state Capitol, especially in the State Senate where Milton Street once sat.

PA’s Republican-controlled Senate did not act on the legalization measure approved last year by the Democratic-controlled PA House. Ironically, a key state Senate proponent for legalization is Milton’s nephew, Sharif Street, who holds the same Senate seat his late uncle once occupied.

It’s time for PA legislators to transform their bad bet on marijuana prohibition into a tax revenue benefit through legalization.

Most Republican legislators in PA’s Capitol refuse to enact repeated requests from Governor Josh Shapiro to legalize and tax marijuana for adult use. Shapiro, like the Streets, recognizes reality: Pennsylvanians use “pot” — one synonym for marijuana. Legalization enjoys wide support among Pennsylvanians.

Shapiro stresses how some Pennsylvanians purchase marijuana in five states that border Pennsylvania where adult use marijuana is legal. Those purchases increase tax revenues in New Jersey, Delaware and those three other border states. (Marijuana for medical use is legalized in Pennsylvania yet those sales are exempt from state and local sales taxes.)

In 1983, Milton Street projected $277 million in new tax revenue annually from legalized marijuana. In 2018, a report released by PA’s then-Auditor General supportive of legalization, projected $580 million annually from taxing marijuana sales. Governor Shapiro’s latest budget projects $729.4 million in the first year of legalization from taxes and one-time licensing fees.

While Milton Street’s visionary 1983 taxation proposal outpaced public polling supportive of marijuana legalization, Street’s proposal did comport with numerous efforts to reform prohibition of marijuana.

A history of failing to act

In 1972, a presidentially-appointed commission recommended decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana. Then-President Richard Nixon rejected the recommendations of his appointed commission, chaired by a former conservative Republican governor of PA.

In 1975, the then-PA Governor’s Council on Drug and Alcohol Abuse recommended decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana.

An August 1975 editorial in The Philadelphia Inquirer endorsed that Council’s call for decriminalization under the headline “Pot isn’t a social menace.” That editorial stated “evidence” refuted claims that marijuana use led to hard drug use and criminal conduct. Incredibly, current opponents of legalization still embrace those two long debunked claims.

PA legislators rejected that Council’s decriminalization recommendation and then blew off a decriminalization bill introduced in 1978. That 1978 bill held support from the PA Bar Association, the PA Medical Society and many of PA’s District Attorneys. The author of that bill, a state legislator from my home community in Pittsburgh, sought to reduce expenditures for marijuana enforcement and reduce racially discriminatory marijuana enforcement practices.

“We can either tax marijuana or raise other taxes. You can’t have it both ways. We don’t manufacture money in Pennsylvania.” — late State Senator Milton Street

Law enforcement across PA expends millions annually arresting people mainly for simple possession of marijuana. That costly enforcement stains arrestees with burdensome criminal records. In 2014, Philadelphia decriminalized possession of marijuana.

The federal government’s 1937 ban on marijuana arose from a racism-tainted campaign launched by the then U.S. drug czar, an official born in Altoona, PA.

Before that federal ban, products containing marijuana were widely available. For example, a Philadelphia firm that made a marijuana product for curing “colds” advertised that product nationally in the late 1800s. Advertisements included The Inquirer and the newspaper of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, a religious denomination founded in Philadelphia.

Opposition to marijuana legalization in PA’s Capitol mirrors resistance legislators once mounted against legalized gambling in PA and ending the state’s Blue Laws that barred all commerce on Sundays.

Casinos and Sunday retail sales each generate tax revenue for the state, as does the state-controlled sale of alcoholic beverages. It’s time for PA legislators to transform their bad bet on marijuana prohibition into a tax revenue benefit through legalization.


Linn Washington Jr. is a journalism professor at Temple University who has reported on and researched marijuana policy since the late 1970s. Washington co-created one of America’s first college courses to prepare journalism students to cover the rapidly expanding marijuana industry.

The Citizen welcomes guest commentary from community members who represent that it is their own work and their own opinion based on true facts that they know firsthand.

MORE ON THE CANNABIS QUESTION

MAPLEWOOD, NEW JERSEY - APRIL 21: A customer receives their order from an employee at Apothecarium Dispensary on April 21, 2022 in Maplewood, New Jersey. Today marked the first day of legal recreational marijuana sales in the state of New Jersey. Voters in the state approved the legalization in November 2020 and with13 dispensaries opening for business today. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Advertising Terms

We do not accept political ads, issue advocacy ads, ads containing expletives, ads featuring photos of children without documented right of use, ads paid for by PACs, and other content deemed to be partisan or misaligned with our mission. The Philadelphia Citizen is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization and all affiliate content will be nonpartisan in nature. Advertisements are approved fully at The Citizen's discretion. Advertisements and sponsorships have different tax-deductible eligibility.

Photo and video disclaimer for attending Citizen events

By entering an event or program of The Philadelphia Citizen, you are entering an area where photography, audio and video recording may occur. Your entry and presence on the event premises constitutes your consent to be photographed, filmed, and/or otherwise recorded and to the release, publication, exhibition, or reproduction of any and all recorded media of your appearance, voice, and name for any purpose whatsoever in perpetuity in connection with The Philadelphia Citizen and its initiatives, including, by way of example only, use on websites, in social media, news and advertising. By entering the event premises, you waive and release any claims you may have related to the use of recorded media of you at the event, including, without limitation, any right to inspect or approve the photo, video or audio recording of you, any claims for invasion of privacy, violation of the right of publicity, defamation, and copyright infringement or for any fees for use of such record media. You understand that all photography, filming and/or recording will be done in reliance on this consent. If you do not agree to the foregoing, please do not enter the event premises.