In May, I lost my race last month for re-election as a Democratic Committee Person, 5th Ward, 13th Division. Jenny Zhang and Max Meshaka, the people who beat me, earned it the only way you can really earn it — by knocking on doors, by working weekends, by getting ballots into dropboxes over a Saturday and a Sunday while my campaign was still admiring its mail-ballot efforts through mail.

Jenny is going places; she is the brains behind this operation, I enjoyed talking to her at the polls most of the day. We found out we had more in common than we thought. I also knew shortly into the day that I would be standing there all day in the heat to lose. But, that’s what elections are for.

Mike Boyle, who has been the leader of the 5th Ward since I first ran for office in 2007, also lost his election to Committeeperson. For those who don’t know, a Ward Executive Committee is the lowest level elected official in the Democratic Party, it is not a state or city office but a party office. It is unpaid. I ran to help Mike stay ward leader not to do the work. “Committeepeople” are the on the ground organizers for the party, they also elect their Ward Leader. Ward leaders elect the Chairperson of the Democratic City Committee. And the City Committee has really outsourced its ground game to paid get out the vote “professionals.” The City Committee really only influences low turnout or low information elections: Think judge, row offices, low dollar races. Candidates, not the party, are the ones who pay for and organize the ground campaign as the party is not effective in high stakes, high information races.

This race proved the party could be much more effective if it focused its dollars and fundraising and organizing and created accountability within its ranks. It’s much easier to run a machine if everyone has a patronage job that will be lost if their division does not produce the results the party wants. 

The mechanics are worth laying out, because they are the entire point of what comes next. The night before the election I was calling super voters the City’s records said hadn’t voted. A lot of them had. The records were stale because the ballots had been dropped over the weekend and hadn’t been logged yet. That is what organizing actually looks like when it’s done by people who know what they’re doing — not a vibe, not a hashtag, not an op-ed. A volunteer at a door. A clipboard. Another. Another. The work the party should have been doing. The work I should have done  for this race. I didn’t. They did. That’s why the result is what it is.

This is part of a larger fight

I want to use this race as an example for a hopeful future, because the race I just lost is a small instance of a much larger fight, and the larger fight is the one I’ve been writing about for months.

The architecture of the wealth transfer — deficits run to fund tax cuts whose gains capitalized into asset prices held by households already old enough to own assets; an estate-and-gift regime that lightly touches accumulated fortunes and a step-up trick that wipes the income-tax slate clean at death; trust structures that extend ownership horizons across centuries — is not somebody else’s problem and it is not abstract. The bill for that architecture was mailed forward to the same generation that is now told, by both parties, that the system is too big to touch and that their best option is to wait for an AI-funded basic income administered by the same class of people who built the extraction in the first place. That is the cage Tocqueville warned about, modernized: a tutelary state that provides selectively, monitors automatically, withdraws discretionarily, and shapes behavior by the credible threat of suspension pending review. A republic of conditional dependents is not a republic. That insight is older than the country.

Here is the part the people knocking on doors understood and the party didn’t. None of that architecture is locked yet. The donor networks have funded most of it. The judiciary is one vote from constitutionalizing, incorrectly, the realization rule that would foreclose a federal wealth tax. The AI labs are training the labor displacement. The UBI proposal is drafted in PowerPoint. But the last bolts haven’t been tightened, and the only force in American politics that has ever, in living memory, beaten the convergence of money and institutions is organized human turnout. Not theory. Not posting. Turnout, built by hand, one door at a time, over weekends. Exhibit A, Hungary.

I want to use this race as an example for a hopeful future, because the race I just lost is a small instance of a much larger fight.

Look at where it’s already working. Under 56 years old in the Massie race, strongly Massie. Over 56, strongly his challenger. Tens of millions of outside dollars poured in to dislodge a sitting congressman, and the generational split is the story — older voters took the cue from the spending; younger ones didn’t. A serious review of the Rabb–Stanford–Street race here showed that exact same generational pattern and the exact same on-the-ground explanation: more doors knocked, more weekends worked, and a ten-to-one small-dollar donor advantage that completely broke the establishment machine. The rule the cycle just confirmed, including in my own race, is the one worth repeating: organizing beats money unless the money is extreme. The exceptions — a handful of overwhelming-money districts — are exceptions. In the broad middle of American politics, the side that puts more people at more doors wins.

Councilmember Brian O’Neill, a Republican, has been showing for 40 years that shoe leather works. He has probably knocked in every door in his district, one-tenth of the City, multiple times. Jenny asked me how he holds on, he answer is simple, he fights for it, just like she is.

That matters because the architecture I’ve been describing is structural, not conspiratorial — convergent self-interest, not a coordinated plot — but it has now entered a new phase. The earlier stages emerged from incentive alignment that nobody had to design. The current stage, the AI stage, is the first one whose principal beneficiaries are conscious enough of the trajectory to be designing it on purpose, in real time, in front of us, for themselves—so they stay the top .01%. They are writing the rules of the post-labor economy while the people who will live inside it are told to wait for the check. The window in which any of that can be unbuilt is the window we are in. It doesn’t close in 2028. It narrows considerably by 2028. The 2026 midterms and 2028 election are existential to voters under 56, and they know it, and they are pissed. I’m glad Jenny and Max will be working my division in those races.

This is yours to claim. The wealth transfer was engineered above your heads and the bill was mailed to you. You don’t have to write a Substack about it. You don’t have to wait for a candidate. You don’t have to be in the room where the donor networks meet, because that room is already lost. You have to knock on doors. The people who beat me did. They didn’t need permission. Neither do you.

The corporatist elite rigged the game in their own favor, lost by their own design, and are now in a total panic because the rank-and-file are finally paying attention and taking over the property.

The old guard isn’t just losing; they are panicking. Look at this week’s primary results in New York, where the establishment was systematically decimated by an organized base that is completely done with the status quo. This wasn’t a fluke; it was a total rout. The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) went a perfect three-for-three in the high-stakes congressional races where they threw down. Not only did Brad Lander topple a multi-millionaire establishment favorite like Dan Goldman, but first-time candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier completely knocked off five-term incumbent Adriano Espaillat — the literal chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. They didn’t just beat the corporatist moderate elite; they went into the Bronx and Upper Manhattan and out-organized senior party leadership right out of their seats.

And look at how that leadership responds when the ground is cut out from under them. Instead of reflecting on why their machine is failing, former DNC Chair Jaime Harrison lashing out, putting the establishment’s entitlement in plain sight:

I say this with no ill will or animosity: if you hate the Democratic Party, then please don’t run for our nomination. Don’t use our resources. Don’t rely on our volunteers. Don’t use our infrastructure … And let me be clear: I don’t care if you’re progressive, moderate, or conservative … If you hate the party, spend your days attacking it, and have contempt for all the people who make it possible.

Notice the absolute cynicism of the framing. Harrison is treating the party like an exclusive private club or estate where a self-appointed management class gets to hand-pick the guests and protect the boardroom. But he’s fundamentally misunderstanding the nature of his own institution. A political party belongs to the members, they are the owners. The insurgents in New York didn’t break a window or knock down a wall to get in; they are the members who followed the club rules to the letter, ran for club offices, and won them fair and square. And once you win the seats, you write the rules. The corporatist elite rigged the game in their own favor, lost by their own design, and are now in a total panic because the rank-and-file are finally paying attention and taking over the property.

But the ultimate sleight of hand is how he uses the grassroots as a human shield. He claims that if you critique the institutional failure of the leadership, you have “contempt” for the volunteers knocking on doors. It’s a total inversion of reality. The insurgents aren’t attacking the people on the doors; they are the people on the doors. The old guard is just furious that their key to the front door is not the only one that works.

Get off this estate.

What for?

Because it’s mine.

Where did you get it?

From my father.

Where did he get it?

From his father.

And where did he get it?

He fought for it.

Well, I’ll fight you for it. 

Those words from Carl Sandburg, written in 1936 in his book long poem, “The People, Yes”, I learned at my Dad’s knee. That’s the energy the party needs and it needs to be directed outward.

Congratulations to our most active members. I mean it. Now let’s go!

Bill Green is a former Philadelphia City Councilmember At-Large and former chair of the School Reform Commission.

The Citizen welcomes guest commentary from community members who represent that it is their own work and their own opinion based on true facts that they know firsthand.

MORE BY BILL GREEN