Do Something

Get more polls. Contact City Council.

Interested in A Greater Philadelphia’s mission? Get updated on events and sign up for their newsletter on their website. You can also follow them on Twitter.

Here you can find the schedule for Philadelphia City Council meetings as well as instructions on how to sign up to speak. You can watch them live here and view the agenda here.


Cheat Sheet

View councilmanic prerogative poll results.

The nonprofit organization A Greater Philadelphia conducted a poll in February of 800 Philly Democrats to focus their efforts toward higher expectations, more effective leadership, and better governance on the issues that matter most.

Councilmanic prerogative, the practice that gives district councilmembers discretion over development in their jurisdictions is not illegal, but it is widely opposed.


66% of respondents oppose councilmanic prerogative.

22% want to keep councilmanic prerogative in place.

At 80%, opposition is greatest in South Philly compared to:

74% opposition in Northeast Philly

71% in Center City

64% in West and Northwest Philly

55% in North Philly

Respondents who approve of City Council’s performance oppose councilmanic prerogative by 59%.

Respondents who disapprove of Council’s performance oppose councilmanic prerogative by 78%.

How Philly Sees Philly: No More Councilmanic Prerogative

The latest polling data from A Greater Philadelphia proves what good government advocates have long said is true: Voters want an end to Council-controlled land deals

How Philly Sees Philly: No More Councilmanic Prerogative

The latest polling data from A Greater Philadelphia proves what good government advocates have long said is true: Voters want an end to Council-controlled land deals

Oh, to live in the land of councilmanic prerogative, the wink-wink practice that gives district councilmembers full discretion over development in their jurisdictions. It’s not actually illegal, something that complicated the corruption trial of Councilmember Kenyatta Johnson and his wife Dawn Chavous that ended this week in a mistrial. Nor is it actually codified into city law. It just … is.

But as the latest survey data released from A Greater Philadelphia shows, Democratic voters in Philadelphia are overwhelmingly opposed to the practice—by a whopping 3-1 margin. Perhaps not coincidentally, the area of the city most opposed is Johnson’s own, South Philadelphia, where 80 percent of respondents said they want the City to ban the practice because it gives too much power to one person.

This data stems from a survey conducted in February by nationally recognized pollsters McLaughlin & Associates and Frederick Polls, as part of civic nonprofit A Greater Philadelphia’s fact-finding mission to inform their goal of building a citywide movement in support of higher expectations, more effective leadership and better governance.

The Citizen is partnering with A Greater Philadelphia to publish the results of the poll. See the first three analyses, about public safety and City Council, here; another on school choice here; and one on the soda tax here.

Poll analysis and results from A Greater Philadelphia

The practice, known as councilmanic prerogative, is not codified in City law. It featured prominently in the mistrial of 2nd District Councilman Kenyatta Johnson. Because of Council’s tradition of deferring to individual Council members for approvals relating to projects in their district, Johnson had the ability to advance or stall the development project which was at the center of the trial.

Here is how a February poll asked the question:

Q. Philadelphia tradition gives each City Council member final control over which construction projects are approved in their district. Which do you prefer?

  1. KEEP this councilmember control in place as a way to protect
    neighborhoods from unwanted development
  2. GET RID OF IT because it gives too much power to one person and can
    lead to secret deals benefiting politically connected developers
  3. Don’t Know/No Answer

Opposition to councilmanic prerogative is strong across all categories of respondents, whether broken out by age, race, income, education level, or section of the city.

Among regions, the strongest opposition is in South Philly, where Councilman Johnson’s district sits. Eighty percent of respondents there want to eliminate the practice.

Even those who approve of the job City Council is doing strongly favor getting rid of the tradition. Only a few do not have an opinion.

More A Greater Philly poll results


Your City Defined: Pay-to-Play

Reality Check: Honor This, City Council

Are City Council Term Limits on the Way?


Header photo of Kenyatta Johnson by Jared Piper / Philadelphia City Council

The Philadelphia Citizen will only publish thoughtful, civil comments. If your post is offensive, not only will we not publish it, we'll laugh at you while hitting delete.

Be a Citizen Editor

Suggest a Story

Advertising Terms

We do not accept political ads, issue advocacy ads, ads containing expletives, ads featuring photos of children without documented right of use, ads paid for by PACs, and other content deemed to be partisan or misaligned with our mission. The Philadelphia Citizen is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization and all affiliate content will be nonpartisan in nature. Advertisements are approved fully at The Citizen's discretion. Advertisements and sponsorships have different tax-deductible eligibility. For questions or clarification on these conditions, please contact Director of Sales & Philanthropy Kristin Long at [email protected] or call (609)-602-0145.