Do Something

Support ranked choice voting in Philly

City Council can’t change this by themselves without state authorizing legislation, but Senator Williams has prepared legislation (SB 59) which would authorize such a system in Philadelphia, and it’s possible it could pick up steam with more vocal support from local elected officials.”

Want to see ranked choice voting in Philly? First, call or email your Councilmembers and ask them to co-sponsor Councilmember Green’s ranked-choice voting resolution. Then let your state Senators know you want them to support SB 59 this fall.

Connect WITH OUR SOCIAL ACTION TEAM



Watch

How does ranked choice voting work?

Cheat Sheet

What cities already use RCV?

Ranked choice voting was adopted in the following cities for various offices (year of adoption in parenthesis):

  • Cambridge (1941) — Cambridge uses the at-large form of RCV for multi-winner elections to city council
  • San Francisco (2002) — 16 out of 18 city offices are elected by RCV
  • Minneapolis, Minnesota (2006)
  • Berkeley, CA (2010)
  • San Leandro, CA (2010)
  • Maine, Statewide (2018)
  • New York City (2021)

Ranked choice voting is also used in overseas runoffs, and is set to be implemented in other cities soon.  See the full list here.

RCV is also used by numerous colleges and universities in their campus elections

Is Ranked-Choice Voting in Philly’s Future?

Councilmember Derek Green wants to bring the polling method here—which could, Philly 3.0’s engagement director says, help elect the people’s choice in an especially competitive 2023 race.

Is Ranked-Choice Voting in Philly’s Future?

Councilmember Derek Green wants to bring the polling method here—which could, Philly 3.0’s engagement director says, help elect the people’s choice in an especially competitive 2023 race.

Philadelphia is coming up on a local election cycle in 2023 that for various reasons is expected to be very competitive. Several members of City Council are expected to resign to run in the open mayoral race, leaving several open Council seats that will likely attract some larger candidate fields.

Our first-past-the-post voting system isn’t the best voting system available in cases where there are large candidate fields and only one possible winner, since somebody can win with just a plurality of the electorate, who the majority of voters don’t support.

There’s a good argument that ranked-choice voting systems do a better job at this by ensuring the winner is somebody who has majority support, and they do this by making voters’ second-, third-, and fourth-choice rankings count for something.

RELATED: How ranked-choice voting could have stopped Donald Trump

By letting people rank their candidate preferences in order, the voting system can take into account people’s second- and third-choice candidate preferences, and reward the candidates who are most acceptable to a majority of voters. This also helps to remove the “spoiler effect” problem under first-past-the-post elections in cases where there are multiple candidates with the same constituency.

There is also some evidence that ranked-choice voting leads to more positive and constructive campaigning, as the candidates have some better incentives to be well-liked by their competitors’ fans, and be the number two or three candidate on a lot of other ballots.

In cities and states with ranked-choice voting, it’s common to see candidates who are running for the same seat cross-endorse one another’s campaigns. In the most recent New York City election—the first one to use the ranked-choice system voters approved—mayoral candidate Andrew Yang endorsed fellow candidate Kathryn Garcia’s campaign, asking his supporters to rank Garcia No. 2 on their ballots (she didn’t endorse him back.)

There’s no prohibition on voters choosing only one candidate like they do now, but it was notable in New York City that voters overwhelmingly used the new ranking system—86 percent of voters overall, ranking on average about three candidates. That’s after the measure was approved by almost 74 percent of voters in a ballot referendum, so it’s evidently been very popular.

In Philadelphia, state Senator Tony Williams had been the only elected official to date to comment on this or to suggest bringing ranked-choice here, so it was interesting to see Councilmember Derek Green starting a local push this week, introducing a resolution to hold hearings on the implications of a ranked-choice voting system in Philadelphia. The resolution was co-sponsored by Councilmembers Cindy Bass, Jamie Gauthier, Isaiah Thomas, and Allan Domb.

City Council can’t change this by themselves without state authorizing legislation, but Senator Williams has prepared legislation (SB 59) which would authorize such a system in Philadelphia, and it’s possible it could pick up steam with more vocal support from local elected officials.

Anyone who wants to see this happen should make sure to call or email their councilmembers and ask them to co-sponsor Councilmember Green’s ranked-choice voting resolution, and then let their state senators know you want them to support SB 59 this fall.


Jon Geeting is the director of engagement at Philadelphia 3.0, a political action committee that supports efforts to reform and modernize City Hall. This is part of a series of articles running on both The Citizen and 3.0’s blog.

RELATED

Guest Commentary: Can We Make Philly a “City That Works?”

Will State Legislators Roll Back Voting Access?

How to Start a Voter Registration Drive

Header photo by Jared Piper / Philadelphia City Council

Advertising Terms

We do not accept political ads, issue advocacy ads, ads containing expletives, ads featuring photos of children without documented right of use, ads paid for by PACs, and other content deemed to be partisan or misaligned with our mission. The Philadelphia Citizen is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization and all affiliate content will be nonpartisan in nature. Advertisements are approved fully at The Citizen's discretion. Advertisements and sponsorships have different tax-deductible eligibility. For questions or clarification on these conditions, please contact Director of Sales & Philanthropy Kristin Long at KL@thephiladelphiacitizen.org or call (609)-602-0145.

Photo and video disclaimer for attending Citizen events

By entering an event or program of The Philadelphia Citizen, you are entering an area where photography, audio and video recording may occur. Your entry and presence on the event premises constitutes your consent to be photographed, filmed, and/or otherwise recorded and to the release, publication, exhibition, or reproduction of any and all recorded media of your appearance, voice, and name for any purpose whatsoever in perpetuity in connection with The Philadelphia Citizen and its initiatives, including, by way of example only, use on websites, in social media, news and advertising. By entering the event premises, you waive and release any claims you may have related to the use of recorded media of you at the event, including, without limitation, any right to inspect or approve the photo, video or audio recording of you, any claims for invasion of privacy, violation of the right of publicity, defamation, and copyright infringement or for any fees for use of such record media. You understand that all photography, filming and/or recording will be done in reliance on this consent. If you do not agree to the foregoing, please do not enter the event premises.