NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

For more info on the Primary

Sign up for our newsletter

We’ll be covering the primary candidates and issues more in the coming weeks—sign up for our newsletter to stay in the loop:

* indicates required



/

( mm / dd )

And follow us on Facebook, Twitter & Instagram.

Why you should vote

In the primary

For one, The Citizen is offering three random voters $1,000 each just for casting a ballot, through our Citizen Municipal Election Voter Lottery.

You get to help choose the city’s top prosecutor, and decide who will oversee courtrooms from here to the state Supreme Court, and vote on ballot questions that can affect the future of our state.

If you don’t, politicians won’t care about you: They may not know how you vote, but they can know if you vote—and if we want our electeds to do right by Philly, then we need to let them know we’re paying attention.

We’ve got more reasons here and here (different elections, same idea).

The Citizen Voter Guide: Primary Election 2021

Heading to the polls on May 18? Our voter guide lays out everything you need to know to vote like a champ.

The Citizen Voter Guide: Primary Election 2021

Heading to the polls on May 18? Our voter guide lays out everything you need to know to vote like a champ.

BY The Philadelphia Citizen Staff

May. 18, 2021

Print

Happy Election Day, Philadelphia!

This is a primary election, so you must be registered as either Democrat or Republican in Pennsylvania to be able to select the candidates who will face off in the November general election on November 2. For Philadelphians registered outside of those parties, such as Independents, you will have a chance to vote on five ballot questions—including an amendment to the Home Rule Charter (more on that below).

With this voter guide, we aim to make that process easier by laying out everything that will be on your ballot below.

Want to skip ahead? See who’s on the ballot in the PA 2021 primary for …


DISTRICT ATTORNEY (VOTE FOR ONE)

As chief prosecutor for the City, the district attorney determines what crimes will be prosecuted, and the severity of the charges. You may ask, “Don’t judges have the final say in sentencing?” Sure, if the case goes to trial. But the vast majority of cases are actually decided by plea bargain, meaning the D.A.’s office has an incredible amount of power and discretion.

DEMOCRAT

Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner announces announce the enforcement of the city’s Failure to Report Lost or Stolen Firearm code.
Democratic district attorney candidate Larry Krasner | Photo by Jared Piper
  • Larry Krasner (incumbent): Longtime civil rights attorney previously known for suing the police 75 times, Larry Krasner won his first election in 2017 on a “progressive prosecutor” platform, with an ambitious—and controversial—slate of criminal justice reforms. His tenure has put to the test the ability to reform the system and keep residents safe, as homicides over the last few years have skyrocketed to levels not seen for decades.
Democratic district attorney candidate Carlos Vega
  • Carlos Vega: The first Latino homicide prosecutor in Pennsylvania, Carlos Vega served in the D.A.’s office for 35 years until Krasner fired him the day he took office. A vocal critic of Krasner, Vega is a “law and order” prosecutor, who has pledged to take on the gun violence epidemic, and to work with the police—whose union has endorsed him—while also prosecuting them for criminal abuses.

 

REPUBLICAN

Philadelphia attorney and district attorney candidate Chuck Peruto
Republican district attorney candidate Chuck Peruto
  • Chuck Peruto: A longtime criminal defense attorney, Democrat-turned-Republican Peruto announced his candidacy in February with an attack on Krasner for being out of touch and ineffective in keeping the people of Philadelphia safe, and with skepticism that Vega can win the primary. Peruto himself is no stranger to controversy, most famously for the so-called “girl in the bathtub” incident in which his legal assistant/girlfriend accidentally died at his house while he was away. (The episode prompted a grand jury investigation that resulted in no charges being filed.)

 

Recent coverage about the D.A. candidates

CITY CONTROLLER (VOTE FOR ONE)

The city controller is the top fiscal watchdog of the city, auditing expenditures of the city government. This race tends to take a back seat to the more high-profile district attorney contest, but it’s incredibly important.

DEMOCRAT

Philadelphia City Controller Rebecca Rhynhart speaks at a City Council hearing
Democratic city controller candidate Rebecca Rhynhart | Photo by Jared Piper
  • Rebecca Rhynhart (incumbent): In her nearly four years as city controller, Rebecca Rhynhart has arguably been the most consistent and fiercest critic of the Kenney administration. She has used the subpoena power of her office to issue reports—like the recent devastating investigation of the city’s law enforcement response to the post-George Floyd protests—that have been substantive, despite Kenney’s accusation that Rhynhart is playing politics. Rhynhart is arguably the city’s most prominent reformer, as evidenced by her role on the advisory council of Accelerator for America, a group of mayors and civic leaders, founded by Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, that bills itself as “the R&D arm of cities and mayors.”

 

REPUBLICAN

  • No Republican is on the ballot.

 

Recent coverage about the city controller candidate

JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT (VOTE FOR ONE)

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the Commonwealth and the oldest appellate court in the nation. There is one vacancy on this court, which is known as the “court of last resort” and can assume jurisdiction over any case in the PA court system. Seven justices serve on the Court and their job is to make the final judgment in interpreting PA’s laws and Constitution.

DEMOCRAT

 

REPUBLICAN

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT (VOTE FOR ONE)

There is one vacancy open in 2021 on the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, which serves as the appeals court for most citizens and businesses. It is one of the busiest intermediate appellate courts in the country, receiving hundreds of thousands of filings per year and deciding more than 8,000 individual cases.

DEMOCRAT

 

REPUBLICAN

JUDGE OF THE COMMONWEALTH COURT (VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN TWO)

There are two vacancies on the Commonwealth Court, which hears civil cases involving state or local government. It also hears appeals and sometimes sits as a trial court in certain cases brought by or against the Commonwealth, such as a constitutional challenge to a state law or a tax dispute. Pennsylvania has the only court like it in the country.

DEMOCRAT

 

REPUBLICAN

JUDGE OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN EIGHT)

There are eight vacancies on this court, which is known as a “general trial jurisdiction court,” because the Courts of Common Pleas are organized into 60 judicial districts. This court is responsible for hearing criminal and civil cases, including those involving families and children; hearing appeals from the minor courts and appeals not exclusively assigned to another court; and holding civil, criminal and jury trials. Sample court cases include divorce, property division, alimony, custody and child support, paternity and protection orders.

Read more about the candidates running for judge of the Court of Common Pleas in our comprehensive PA judicial election guide.

DEMOCRAT

 

REPUBLICAN

  • There is no Republican on the ballot.

JUDGE OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT (VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN THREE)

There are three vacancies on the Philadelphia Municipal Court, which is responsible for determining whether serious criminal cases go to the Court of Common Pleas; preliminary arraignments and hearings; and setting and accepting bail, except in murder or voluntary manslaughter cases. Some sample court cases include traffic tickets, landlord-tenant disputes, underage drinking.

Read more about the candidates running for a seat on the Philadelphia Municipal Court in our comprehensive PA judicial election guide.

DEMOCRAT

 

REPUBLICAN

    • There is no Republican on the ballot.

JUDGE AND INSPECTOR OF ELECTION (VOTE FOR ONE)

These folks are your neighbors, and must live in your voting division (e.g. 2-06 means Ward 2, Division 6). Two inspectors in each division make sure the polling machines are up and running on time, and one judge of election ensures everything is setup in compliance with state and local laws. There are 1,686 divisions in the city, so we suggest checking out this PDF page from the City Commissioners Office to find all the candidates running in your district.

BALLOT MEASURES

Philadelphia voters will weigh in on five ballot questions in the 2021 primary. For a full breakdown of what these measures mean, go to the Committee of Seventy’s explainer here.

Question 1: Termination or Extension of Disaster Emergency Declarations

Ballot Language: Shall the Pennsylvania Constitution be amended to change existing law and increase the power of the General Assembly to unilaterally terminate or extend a disaster emergency declaration—and the powers of Commonwealth agencies to address the disaster regardless of its severity pursuant to that declaration—through passing a concurrent resolution by simple majority, thereby removing the existing check and balance of presenting a resolution to the Governor for approval or disapproval?

Plain Language: This constitutional amendment, according to the Office of the Attorney General, would allow the General Assembly to terminate or extend a disaster emergency declaration or a portion of such declaration without needing the governor’s approval. The amendment came about in response to Gov. Wolf’s emergency declarations during the coronavirus epidemic, but the language has been a source of continuing controversy

A “yes” vote supports this constitutional amendment to allow the Pennsylvania General Assembly to pass a resolution, which the governor cannot veto, by a simple majority to extend or terminate the governor’s emergency declaration.

A”no” vote opposes this constitutional amendment, meaning that the governor would continue to be allowed to veto resolutions terminating emergency declarations and a two-thirds legislative vote would be required to override the veto.

Question 2: Pennsylvania Emergency Declarations Amendment

Ballot Language: Shall the Pennsylvania Constitution be amended to change existing law so that: a disaster emergency declaration will expire automatically after 21 days, regardless of the severity of the emergency, unless the General Assembly takes action to extend the disaster emergency; the Governor may not declare a new disaster emergency to respond to the dangers facing the Commonwealth unless the General Assembly passes a concurrent resolution; the General Assembly enacts new laws for disaster management?

Plain Language: According to the Office of the Attorney General, this amendment would:

  • Grant the governor authority to declare a disaster emergency declaration by proclamation or executive order;
  • Require each declaration to indicate the nature, location and type of disaster;
  • Grant the General Assembly authority to pass laws providing for the manner in which each disaster shall be managed;
  • Limit the duration of a governor’s declaration to 21 days, unless otherwise extended, in whole or in part, by a concurrent resolution of the General Assembly;
  • Prevent the governor, upon the expiration of a declaration, from issuing a new declaration based upon the same or substantially similar facts, unless the General Assembly passes a concurrent resolution expressly approving a new declaration.

A “yes” vote supports this constitutional amendment to limit the governor’s emergency declaration to 21 days unless the legislature votes on a concurrent resolution to extend the order and provide that the state legislature shall pass laws related to how disaster emergencies must be managed.

A “no” vote opposes this constitutional amendment, meaning the governor would continue to be allowed to issue emergency declarations without a legislative vote after 21 days.

Question 3: Prohibition Against Denial or Abridgement of Equality of Rights Because of Race or Ethnicity

Ballot Language: Shall the Pennsylvania Constitution be amended by adding a new section providing that equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged because of an individual’s race or ethnicity?

Plain language: According to the Office of the Attorney General, if passed, this amendment would make it illegal to restrict or deny an individual’s equal rights under Pennsylvania law because of race or ethnicity.

A “yes” vote supports adding language to the state constitution that prohibits the denial or curtailing of rights on account of an individual’s race or ethnicity.

A “no” vote opposes adding language to the state constitution that prohibits the denial or curtailing of rights on account of an individual’s race or ethnicity.

Question 4: Making Municipal Fire and Emergency Medical Services Companies Eligible for Loans

Ballot Language: Do you favor expanding the use of the indebtedness authorized under the referendum for loans to volunteer fire companies, volunteer ambulance services and volunteer rescue squads under 35 PA.C.S. §7378.1 (related to referendum for additional indebtedness) to include loans to municipal fire departments or companies that provide services through paid personnel and emergency medical services companies for the purpose of establishing and modernizing facilities to house apparatus equipment, ambulances and rescue vehicles, and for purchasing apparatus equipment, ambulances and rescue vehicles, protective and communications equipment and any other accessory equipment necessary for the proper performance of the duties of the fire companies and emergency medical services companies?

Plain Language: The purpose of the ballot question, according to the Attorney General, is to determine whether Pennsylvania voters authorize making municipal fire departments or companies with paid personnel and emergency medical services companies eligible to apply for loans from an already existing state loan program. This referendum does not authorize incurring any additional debt to fund the loan program; it only expands the class of eligible loan applicants.

A “yes” vote would allow fire departments to apply for loans from the state program.

A “no” vote would prevent fire departments from applying for loans from the state program.

Question 5: Proposed Philadelphia Home Rule Charter Change

Ballot Language: Shall The Philadelphia Home Rule Charter be amended to provide for an expanded Board of License Inspection Review that can hear and decide cases in three-member panels?

Plain Language: The City’s Home Rule Charter is like the City’s constitution; it sets up the rules for City government. If you vote “Yes” on this ballot question, it means you want to change the City’s Charter so that the City’s Board of License and Inspection Review is expanded to have nine members and is allowed to hear and decide cases in groups of three members at a time.

A “yes” vote would allow the Board to increase to nine members, and allow the Board Chair to designate groups of three members to hear and decide cases, which might allow the process to move more quickly.

A “no” vote would keep the system as it is, with the full Board consisting of six members, the majority of whom must participate in order to hear a case.

Further reading on the Home Rule Charter

Header photo by Phil Roeder / Flickr

The Philadelphia Citizen will only publish thoughtful, civil comments. If your post is offensive, not only will we not publish it, we'll laugh at you while hitting delete.

Be a Citizen Editor

Suggest a Story

Related Stories

Advertising Terms

We do not accept political ads, issue advocacy ads, ads containing expletives, ads featuring photos of children without documented right of use, ads paid for by PACs, and other content deemed to be partisan or misaligned with our mission. The Philadelphia Citizen is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization and all affiliate content will be nonpartisan in nature. Advertisements are approved fully at The Citizen's discretion. Advertisements and sponsorships have different tax-deductible eligibility. For questions or clarification on these conditions, please contact Director of Sales & Philanthropy Kristin Long at [email protected] or call (609)-602-0145.