Do Something

Stay informed

The city provides easy access to data on where your tax dollars are spent. The City Controller’s Office’s most recent data on soda tex revenue expenditures is through June 2021. 


Learn More

Why the controversy?

Want answers to everything you wanted to know about the soda tax but were afraid to ask?

The Urban Institute is a non-profit research organization that provides data for policymakers and leaders to help make decisions and solve problems. Here is their one-stop resource on soda taxes: how they work, where they have been enacted, and the pros and cons. 

Want to know who A Greater Philadelphia is? Learn who they are and what their mission is on their website.

Get Involved

Check out our toolkit for good citizenship

One of the founding tenets of The Philadelphia Citizen is to get people the resources they need to become better, more engaged citizens of their city.

We hope to do that in our Good Citizenship Toolkit, which includes a host of ways to get involved in Philadelphia—whether you want to contact your City Councilmember to voice your concerns about city taxes, get those experiencing homelessness the goods they need, or simply go out to dinner somewhere where you know your money is going toward a greater good.

Find an issue that’s important to you in the list below, and get started on your journey of A-plus citizenship.

Vote and strengthen democracy

Stand up for marginalized communities

Create a cleaner, greener Philadelphia

Help our local youth and schools succeed

Support local businesses

Guest Commentary: Pre-K Polling Needs Improvement

A Greater Philadelphia last week released poll data about the City’s sweetened beverage tax that showed residents divided. Here, the City’s first Pre-K director refutes the premise and results of the survey

Guest Commentary: Pre-K Polling Needs Improvement

A Greater Philadelphia last week released poll data about the City’s sweetened beverage tax that showed residents divided. Here, the City’s first Pre-K director refutes the premise and results of the survey

As they say to small children in child care centers, “sharing is caring.” I care about the quality of our civic dialogue and the values held by the next mayor. So I am sharing some thoughts here about a misleading polling question conducted by A Greater Philadelphia and published here in The Citizen last week.

In 2017, Philadelphia became the largest city in the United States to implement a 1.5-percent tax on sweetened beverages. When City Council voted 13 to 4 in favor, it sent shock waves through Big Soda, an industry that enjoys billions in profits. So many celebrated mightily because the vision for PHLpreK, Community Schools and the investments in the REBUILD sites could move from design to launch.

PHLpreK has since served over 10,000 families with free, quality pre-K. The program incentivizes and finances child care centers so they can boost quality in all neighborhoods. It bolsters women and minority-owned businesses in the child care sector. Despite these accomplishments, A Greater Philadelphia issued a poll question loaded with thinly veiled attacks on the funding source for one of the most proven, efficient and effective public policy paths to improving a child’s life trajectory.

Why the recent polling about the city’s soda tax is deeply flawed


The question implied that half the tax generated is money for PHLpreK but the remainder is being used for wanton purposes. The tax not only supports PHLpreK but also specific uses of capital investments in playgrounds, parks, libraries and the ongoing Community Schools program. Yes, in FY 2021, the tax generated just under $70 million for the City. However, the verbiage explaining the polling data implies says that half of the law’s revenue was used for PHLpreK, but “most of the rest was spread across the general fund.”

The revenue is designed and obligated for a fuller expansion of PHLpreK and continued costs of the other programs. PHLpreK cannot be invested all at once. Quality child care centers can only expand capacity slowly and sustainably. Physical child care spaces require special aspects and need long-term investments in leases or mortgages. The workforce supply ramps up slowly too. Talent pipelines for recruitment and professional qualifications are all being built and fragile. Retention of owners, directors and teachers is an ongoing challenge, exacerbated by the private-sector wage increases. Reliable, ongoing financial support of the sector is key to its health.


The intent of the law was never about anti-obesity or sugar-related health problems. People do not like being told what to do with their own body. Go no further than the current mask backlash to know this to be true. While the health benefits are real, the PHLBevTax law exists because of a strong, diverse, well-organized coalition favoring parks, playgrounds, libraries, community schools and quality Pre-K. The polling question is disinformation designed to generate and misdirect anger. People from all neighborhoods now benefit from PHLpreK and the other initiatives.


A false outcome of the tax is embedded in the question. There is scant evidence it has hurt the City’s economy. In fact, the beverage industry is doing better than ever as sales of non-sweet beverages, such as filtered water in plastic bottles, increased. Further—like with alcohol and tobacco taxes—some people did initially travel over county lines to avoid the 1.5 percent tax. But also, like tobacco and alcohol, residents soon realized the tax was too negligible to justify the inconvenience and extra gasoline costs as evident by fairly stable tax revenues. It takes a few years for these types of taxes to become more predictable.

A Greater Philadelphia apparently exists to “raise expectations” and “demand better”. However, the recent polling question is unaligned with a mission. As a 501c4 organization, this group will most likely endorse candidates. Last week, it became clear they are likely to endorse at least one candidate who also enjoys a blessing from Big Soda. The polling question was a bad omen for the quality of upcoming civic dialogue.

The electorate deserves a discussion about each candidate’s vision. We do not need a reactionary and distorted debate attacking Philadelphia accomplishments while rehashing past—and settled—political battles. The City of Philadelphia needs to focus on performance and problem-solving, not pettiness. Let’s please have a fact-based civic dialogue instead of relying on “polling data” contrived for the benefit of Big Soda.

Anne Gemmell was the City’s first pre-K director and then led the “future of work” policy response. She founded Future Works Alliance PHL and is now a certified collaboration architect at A.Gemm Consulting, a business specializing in strategic collaboration for innovative leaders.

The Citizen welcomes guest commentary from community members who stipulate to the best of their ability that it is fact-based and non-defamatory.


Guest Commentary: In Defense of the Soda Tax

What Are the Soda Tax Facts?

The Tax That Ate Philadelphia

Philly Poll: Yes to Soda Tax


Photo by Amanda Shepherd on Unsplash

The Philadelphia Citizen will only publish thoughtful, civil comments. If your post is offensive, not only will we not publish it, we'll laugh at you while hitting delete.

Be a Citizen Editor

Suggest a Story

Advertising Terms

We do not accept political ads, issue advocacy ads, ads containing expletives, ads featuring photos of children without documented right of use, ads paid for by PACs, and other content deemed to be partisan or misaligned with our mission. The Philadelphia Citizen is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization and all affiliate content will be nonpartisan in nature. Advertisements are approved fully at The Citizen's discretion. Advertisements and sponsorships have different tax-deductible eligibility. For questions or clarification on these conditions, please contact Director of Sales & Philanthropy Kristin Long at [email protected] or call (609)-602-0145.