Do Something

We need efficient public transit

SEPTA is in the midst of modernizing the trolley system, redesigning our bus network, and more as part of its SEPTA Forward initiative. Keep up date on these projects and give your input, these are your transit systems, and they have to work for all our benefit.

Find out who represents you on the City Council and reach out to let them know you want Philly to have an advanced, efficient public transit system.


Get Involved

Check out our toolkit for better citizenship

One of the founding tenets of The Philadelphia Citizen is to get people the resources they need to become better, more engaged citizens of their city.

We hope to do that in our Good Citizenship Toolkit, which includes a host of ways to get involved in Philadelphia—whether you want to contact your City Councilmember to voice your support for modernizing SEPTA, get those experiencing homelessness the goods they need, or simply go out to dinner somewhere where you know your money is going toward a greater good.

Find an issue that’s important to you in the list below, and get started on your journey of A-plus citizenship.

Vote and strengthen democracy

Stand up for marginalized communities

Create a cleaner, greener Philadelphia

Help our local youth and schools succeed

Support local businesses

Solutions-based Journalism

How to save urban transit systems

The Philadelphia Citizen practices solutions-based journalism. We don’t just report on the challenges our city faces, we report on the potential solutions to those challenges. In this story:

Structural changes brought on by the pandemic are depleting urban centers of once plentiful revenue. Remote work has led to deserted downtowns that supported a large population of office workers.  Businesses, real estate, and the tax base have lost their fiscal foundation. 

Urban transit systems saw ridership disappear, and only partially reappear as the pandemic slowly passes. More workers are escaping the crushing grind of office-bound jobs and long commutes, and lingering spikes in crime are keeping many others off trains and buses. Decreased personnel and revenue have resulted in delays and other operational issues, reducing ridership even further. While federal rescue funds have propped up existing systems so far, a reckoning is at hand.

What can be done to save transit systems from collapse?

Some states are beginning to budget for rescue funds to protect these services. New York has raised $800 million for New York City’s huge, aging public transit system.

Some cities are beginning to diversify their downtowns, converting office buildings for residential use, relocating anchor institutions and innovation centers to these areas, turning under-utilized waterfronts into destinations and considering sports and entertainment venues in more central locations.

Some transit systems are making reforms, like Denver’s overhaul of its metro bus system to increase service in high-ridership areas and Philadelphia’s (postponed) SEPTA bus route redesign.

While these are steps in the right direction, more radical shifts in funding sources are needed to support transportation systems and transform what were once office-worker-supported economies into something more diverse.


Can Cities Defy Fiscal Gravity?

As urban transit systems like SEPTA face a crisis since Covid, Drexel’s Metro Finance head looks to the innovators who are rethinking how we get around

Can Cities Defy Fiscal Gravity?

As urban transit systems like SEPTA face a crisis since Covid, Drexel’s Metro Finance head looks to the innovators who are rethinking how we get around

I was a major consumer of Saturday morning cartoons in my childhood.

My favorite, by far, was Wile E. Coyote and The Roadrunner. The plots were as simple as they were effective. Coyote would chase Roadrunner across deserts and mountains, concocting elaborate schemes to ensnare the fast-footed bird. The schemes always failed, with Coyote usually flying over a high cliff, realizing that he was suspended in midair, looking at the camera with an air of surprise and panic and then plummeting to the bottom of the abyss.

In our “not-so-post-pandemic phase,” cities are experiencing their own Wile E. Coyote moment.

With federal funds flush and programmatic deadlines tight, cities are in a frantic chase for unprecedented levels of government resources. The moment is occupying tens of thousands of city builders in the public, private and civic sector.

Yet, as communities try to build the future, structural changes brought on by the pandemic are simultaneously eroding urban cores. Remote work is tearing down central business areas that were built up over the past several decades. It is fundamentally altering where people work with profound implications for the rhythms of daily life.

No doubt, the absence of punishing, long-distance commutes means that millions of people find themselves, miraculously, with more time and less stress.

But the economic and fiscal consequences are profound. Downtowns have served as the centers of office employment and prime generators of tax revenues for decades. They have attracted large-scale investments in commercial real estate and been a key source of demand for major transit systems and countless small businesses. One doesn’t simply end these “settled” roles and functions without repercussions.

To a large extent, ample federal rescue funds have masked the full impact of what has occurred and delayed the reckoning that must follow.

The fiscal effects are still unfolding due to infusions of federal largesse. The variance of municipal tax regimes across the country also complicates the tax hit — when it will occur and how large it will be. My colleagues and I will write about this more in the months to come.

The crisis in transit systems

But the effects on older, mature transit systems are emerging in real-time. Ridership has fallen through the floor, with obvious implications for revenues and services. In many respects, transit systems are the proverbial canary in the coal mine.

Take New York City, the nation’s largest public transit system, where ridership is 60 percent of what it was pre-pandemic. According to multiple articles in The New York Times, the drop in subway ridership has meant that the share of operating revenues that come from fares has dropped from 40 percent before the pandemic to 23 percent today. The New York State Comptroller reported last year that the Metropolitan Transportation Authority budget gap will be short $2.5 billion per year once pandemic aid runs out in 2025.

In San Francisco, recent reporting by Heather Knight at the San Francisco Chronicle found that:

[Bay Area Rapid Transit] has recovered just 40 percent of its ridership and faces disaster by early 2025 when federal pandemic funding runs out. If ridership doesn’t rebound significantly, the agency could be forced to stop weekday trains by 9pm, eliminate weekend service, close some stations, institute 60-minute wait times for trains and lay off staff.

In Boston, Bruce Mohl at Commonwealth Magazine recently reported that fare revenue is less than 50 percent of pre-pandemic levels (although it was trending higher than expected).

Remote work, of course, bears primary responsibility for the collapse in ridership. But security concerns, particularly among women users, plays a substantial role. And funding shortages routinely lead to delays in service which then potentially result in further drops in ridership.

This period is generating a strange juxtaposition of abundance and scarcity, of creation and destruction. On one hand, the federal government is spending hundreds of billions of dollars to repair the nation’s infrastructure, including tens of billions of dollars in our public transit systems. On the other hand, those systems have partially lost their raison d’etre due to distributed patterns of work and the radical decline in employment density.

Crisis, of course, begets innovation or, at least a lifeline

States are beginning to step in with their own rescue funds to shore up services. New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s latest budget would raise $800 million for the beleaguered transit system. This intervention should not be surprising since New York State runs the Metropolitan Transportation Authority for New York City. It is generally acknowledged that more radical shifts in funding sources are needed.

Cities themselves are moving as quickly as they can to diversify uses within the downtowns. They are starting to convert office buildings for residential use, locate new anchor institutions and innovation campuses to the cores, consider sports arenas for central sites and remake under-utilized waterfronts as destinations. All of this activity will affect transit ridership in time but probably not fast enough to stop the financial hemorrhage.

And transit system themselves are making reforms. Denver, for example, is carrying out a substantial overhaul of the metro’s bus systems to place more frequent service in high-ridership areas.

It is questionable whether the federal government, now deeply divided, can be a major source of additional rescue capital. At a minimum, however, they should act as a responsible steward of transit systems, given the outsized effects these systems have on climate change and economic inclusion. An objective scorecard of the fiscal travails of transit systems and state and local responses, regularly updated, would be a small way of balancing the rosy picture presented by federal infrastructure awards.

Like Wile E. Coyote, our mature metropolitan transit systems are presently defying fiscal gravity, buttressed by federal dollars which will soon reach their end. But fortunes will change in the not-so-distant future. It’s a long way to fall.

Bruce Katz is the Founding Director of the Nowak Metro Finance Lab at Drexel University.


Photo by Theo Wyss-Flamm

The Philadelphia Citizen will only publish thoughtful, civil comments. If your post is offensive, not only will we not publish it, we'll laugh at you while hitting delete.

Be a Citizen Editor

Suggest a Story

Advertising Terms

We do not accept political ads, issue advocacy ads, ads containing expletives, ads featuring photos of children without documented right of use, ads paid for by PACs, and other content deemed to be partisan or misaligned with our mission. The Philadelphia Citizen is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization and all affiliate content will be nonpartisan in nature. Advertisements are approved fully at The Citizen's discretion. Advertisements and sponsorships have different tax-deductible eligibility. For questions or clarification on these conditions, please contact Director of Sales & Philanthropy Kristin Long at [email protected] or call (609)-602-0145.