By signing up to our newsletter, you agree to our terms.

The Citizen Recommends: Melina Uncapher

In the latest in Drexel’s ExCITe Center’s Education Innovation series, a neuroscientist explores how brain science can improve student learning

In the latest in Drexel’s ExCITe Center’s Education Innovation series, a neuroscientist explores how brain science can improve student learning

How do students learn? This is the question that hangs over everything that happens in the classroom, and that scientists have been studying in their labs for years. But until recently, the laboratory research wasn’t actually making its way to the people who need it most: Classroom teachers.

That’s what Melina Uncapher, a University of California-San Francisco neuroscientist, is doing with her Institute for Applied Neuroscience, and what she plans to discuss Tuesday as part of Drexel ExCITe’s Learning Innovations series.

This story made possible by our members.
What story will you make possible? Join today!

Uncapher has spent last the 17 years studying how people learn and remember, research she has deployed as a fellow for the MacArthur Foundation to criminal justice—specifically, the reliability of eyewitness testimony. More recently, she has started to apply her research to the field of education, through a nonprofit she started that takes her around the world to talk with teachers about what she has learned herself in her neuroscience lab.

The field of learning science has been around for the last century, but the brain science of learning is only a few decades old. Uncapher’s work joins cognitive science, which looks at how we pay attention; social and emotional sciences, which look at how other factors in our bodies create conditions for learning; and teachers themselves. That last piece—what teachers know from their work—is often left out of academic discussions. “There’s often not a lot of bi-directional dialogue in science,” Uncapher says. “We need to recognize the wisdom of the practicioner. They study the way people learn everyday. We as the scientists need to respect and understand that, and learn from them.”

Uncapher’s work is part of her effort to make science understandable, and usable, by the public, something much needed these days. Her research involves using MRIs to look at the parts of the brain that are working as her undergrad subjects see pictures, and then are later asked to remember them. That has translated to her work with lawyers and the courts on how people remember incidents they have witnessed. In the last couple years, she has worked with thousands of teachers, who have used her studies to improve student outcomes.

“Any scientific discipline that’s made a difference in real-world problems, it hasn’t been scientists who have done that,” Uncapher says. “It’s the engineers who have translated that to fix a problem. I’m trying to advance the concept of learning engineering: How do we take principles of science of learning, the process of engineering and practice of teaching to improve how students learn?”

Tuesday January 30, 6 p.m.-8 p.m., Free, Drexel University’s ExCITe Center, 20 S. 33rd Street. Register here.

The Philadelphia Citizen will only publish thoughtful, civil posts. We want to be a communal space. But that doesn’t mean you have a First Amendment right to be an idiot. Send us an insulting, offensive and/or wildly off-topic comment and not only will we refrain from posting it -- we will laugh at you before we hit delete.

Be a Citizen Editor

Suggest a Story